The 340B program was designed with equity in mind. It enables hospitals and clinics serving low-income and underserved populations to purchase outpatient medications at reduced prices. The expectation was that the savings would flow directly into expanding healthcare access for marginalized communities. The reality, however, is more complex. Without clear metrics or public reporting requirements, there’s no way to ensure that these funds are being used as intended.
Advocates for health equity, including BlackDoctor.org, have sounded the alarm. The lack of accountability within the program is particularly concerning when Black and Brown communities—already disproportionately impacted by health disparities—stand to lose the most. When hospitals benefiting from the 340B discounts are not required to disclose how they allocate those funds, it creates a troubling void. Are these resources truly being reinvested to reduce disparities, or are they padding institutional bottom lines? This is not merely a policy question; it is a matter of justice and equity.
While Senate Bill 1179 imposes stringent reporting requirements on pharmaceutical manufacturers, it does little to address the responsibilities of hospitals, which are the primary beneficiaries of 340B savings. This imbalance leaves critical questions unanswered. How are these institutions using the funds? Are they expanding services in underserved neighborhoods? Are drug prices being lowered for vulnerable populations? Transparency, if it is to be meaningful, must be reciprocal. Holding manufacturers accountable while exempting hospitals from similar scrutiny is a flawed approach that undermines the program’s mission.
The omission is not just a bureaucratic oversight; it is a systemic failure that disproportionately harms the communities the program was designed to serve. Safety-net hospitals and community clinics, lifelines for many Black Michiganders, often depend on 340B savings to operate. However, without robust accountability measures, there is no guarantee that these resources are being directed toward the patients and communities who need them most. This lack of transparency erodes trust and perpetuates inequities in a healthcare system already riddled with disparities.
The moral imperative here cannot be overstated. Michigan’s lawmakers have a responsibility to ensure that the 340B program fulfills its promise to the underserved. That means amending Senate Bill 1179 to include comprehensive reporting requirements for hospitals. Public disclosure of how much hospitals save through the program—and how those savings are reinvested into patient care—would go a long way toward building trust and ensuring accountability.
In a state where racial disparities in health outcomes remain stark, this is not a small ask. Black communities in Michigan continue to experience higher rates of chronic illnesses, shorter life expectancies, and limited access to quality care. The 340B program, if properly implemented, has the potential to be a powerful tool for addressing these inequities. But that potential will remain unrealized without mechanisms to track and measure how hospitals are using their savings.
The stakes are too high to accept half-measures. Transparency is not just a bureaucratic checkbox; it is a vital step toward equity. Without it, we risk allowing hospitals to operate in the shadows, benefiting from taxpayer-supported discounts while failing to deliver on their commitments to underserved populations.
The absence of accountability is not a victimless oversight. It is Black and Brown Michiganders—those who rely most on safety-net healthcare providers—who pay the price. These communities deserve better. They deserve to know how hospitals are leveraging their 340B savings to expand access, reduce costs, and improve health outcomes. Anything less is a disservice to the very populations the program was created to uplift.
This moment calls for leadership that prioritizes equity over expediency. Michigan lawmakers must act with urgency to amend Senate Bill 1179. Rejecting the current version of the bill and demanding stronger accountability measures for hospitals is not just the right thing to do—it is a necessary step toward restoring public confidence in the 340B program.
As advocates, we must continue to push for transparency that goes beyond rhetoric. Comprehensive reporting requirements would ensure that 340B dollars are being used to address health disparities, not to bolster institutional budgets. They would provide a clear picture of how these funds are being allocated and whether they are making a tangible difference in the lives of marginalized communities.
Accountability is not optional. It is a cornerstone of equity and justice. Michigan cannot afford to allow the 340B program to become a missed opportunity. Lawmakers have a responsibility to ensure that this program lives up to its promise, delivering real and measurable benefits to the communities that need it most.
BlackDoctor.org has been clear in its call to action. As they rightly point out, the absence of transparency undermines the program’s intent. Their alarm is one we all must heed. The health and well-being of Michigan’s most vulnerable populations depend on our collective commitment to equity, accountability, and justice.
This is not just a legislative issue; it is a moral one. Michigan House members must demand more. They must ask the hard questions, challenge the status quo, and refuse to settle for legislation that leaves the most critical aspects of transparency undefined.
The passage of Senate Bill 1179 in its current form would be a step backward for health equity in Michigan. Black communities, already bearing the weight of systemic inequities, cannot afford to wait for lawmakers to get it right in the future. The time for action is now.
Transparency, when measured and enforced, is a powerful tool for change. Michigan lawmakers have the opportunity to ensure that the 340B program achieves its full potential, uplifting the underserved and addressing the disparities that have long plagued our healthcare system. The question is: will they rise to the occasion?
About Post Author
